2. McLuhan asserted that technology would expand human senses beyond what we are capable of. The text cites examples like the manipulation of synthesizers to create mandala-like image effects in live shows, but this seems to be a very specific example. Do all types of technology help to expand human senses? Is this the primary reason for the creation of certain technologies, or can things be invented without the intention of expanding senses?
Monday, September 23, 2013
Reading 2: Video Art
1. Following the release of portable video cameras, Radical Software claimed "Power is no longer measured in land, labor, or capital, but by access to information and the means to disseminate it." Is this still true in modern day society, after the inventions of many more technological advances besides industrial video cameras?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Usually when I come across any argument that positions power in the hands of 'the elite', I am quick to say no. In fact, I think the general public is now in greater position to claim the power of accessing all this information. Despite horror stories about the NSA or DRM laws coming into effect, we effectively (and artistically) have the ability to create a social atmosphere which champions creativity. We have the power to disseminate data, because we simply outnumber the amount of people necessary to keep a server alive.
ReplyDeleteAs much as it pains me to say, not 'every' technology is invented to expand human senses. For a subjective example to my own tastes, I think video games or games in general were invented to distract the human senses than expand. It is just as a side effect that they happen to cause greater hand-eye coordination. It is good to point out that there is a difference between constructive technology and those with alternate motives. Good.